PDF

Sustainable waste management & valorisation within the circular economy era: Closed-loop recycling of lithium iron phosphate cathodic powders via citric acid leaching

Martina Bruno, Carlotta Francia

2024enrecyclinglithiumcitric acidleachingsustainability

Abstract

Language:

Lithium recovery from Lithium-ion batteries requires hydrometallurgy but up-to-date technologies aren’t economically viable for Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP) batteries. Selective leaching (specifically targeting Lithium and based on mild organic acids and low temperatures) is attracting attention because of decreased environmental impacts compared to conventional hydrometallurgy. This study analysed the technical and economic performances of selective leaching with 6%vv. H2O2 and citric acid (0.25-1 M, 25 °C, 1 h, 70 g/l) compared with conventional leaching with an inorganic acid (H2SO4 1 M, 40 °C, 2 h, 50 g/l) and an organic acid (citric acid 1 M, 25 °C, 1 h, 70 g/l) to recycle end of life LFP cathodes. After conventional leaching, chemical precipitation allowed to recover in multiple steps Li, Fe and P salts, while selective leaching allowed to recover Fe and P, in the leaching residues and required chemical precipitation only for lithium recovery. Conventional leaching with 1 M acids achieved leaching efficiencies equal to 95 ± 2% for Li, 98 ± 8% for Fe, 96 ± 3% for P with sulfuric acid and 83 ± 0.8% for Li, 8 ± 1% for Fe, 12 ± 5% for P with citric acid. Decreasing citric acid’s concentration from 1 to 0.25 M didn’t substantially change leaching efficiency. Selective leaching with citric acid has higher recovery efficiency (82 ± 6% for Fe, 74 ± 8% for P, 29 ± 5% for Li) than conventional leaching with sulfuric acid (69 ± 15% for Fe, 70 ± 18% for P, and 21 ± 2% for Li). Also, impurities’ amounts were lower with citric acid (335 ± 19 mg/kg of S) than with sulfuric acid (8104 ± 2403 mg/kg of S). In overall, the operative costs associated to 0.25 M citric acid route (3.17€/kg) were lower compared to 1 M sulfuric acid (3.52€/kg). In conclusion, citric acid could be a viable option to lower LFP batteries’ recycling costs, and it should be further explored prioritizing Lithium recovery and purity of recovered materials.

Download

Cite This Work

@article{4525b7a6-d080-4898-9fdd-fe67daef78d0,
  title={Sustainable waste management & valorisation within the circular economy era: Closed-loop recycling of lithium iron phosphate cathodic powders via citric acid leaching},
  author={Martina Bruno and Carlotta Francia},
  year={2024},
  language={en}
}
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sustainable waste management & valorisation within the circular economy era: Closed-loop recycling of lithium iron phosphate cathodic powders via citric acid leaching
AU  - Martina Bruno
AU  - Carlotta Francia
PY  - 2024
LA  - en
ER  -

Similar Items

Treatment of manufacturing scrap TV boar

The leachability tests for manufacturing scrap TV boards (STVB) have indicated the release of metals beyond the limit levels with potential problems f

2026enPDF

Recovery of precious metals from e waste

Printed circuit boards (PCBs) from electronic gadgets at the end of their useful life period are currently being dumped in landfills or incinerated, c

2026enPDF

Challenges and opportunities in the recovery of gold from electronic waste

Mudila Dhanunjaya Rao, Kamalesh K. Singh

Rapid global technological development has resulted in increased production of electronic waste, which presents both challenges and opportunities in r

2023enPDF

THE FUTURE OF ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING IN THE UNITED STATES: Obstacles and Domestic Solutions

Jennifer Namias, Dr. Nickolas J. Themelis

This study explores the future of electronic waste recycling in the United States, addressing the challenges and proposing domestic solutions. The rap

2013enPDF

Design for Recovery of Precious and Base

2026enPDF

Environmental and Human Health Risks Ass

2026enPDF