V.E. Sandana, D.J. Rogers
Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens, and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues, an increasing rarity due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand, and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus, alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.
@article{6fc50142-53ba-4db0-8d9d-e26491a1d744,
title={Graphene versus oxides for transparent e},
author={V.E. Sandana and D.J. Rogers},
year={2026},
language={en}
}TY - JOUR TI - Graphene versus oxides for transparent e AU - V.E. Sandana AU - D.J. Rogers PY - 2026 LA - en ER -
Unknown, Unknown
This chapter discusses metal casting processes, highlighting the diversity and common characteristics among them. The objective is to elucidate the fu
Unknown, Unknown
This study focuses on the fundamental characteristics of solid iron, which is predominantly composed of iron atoms and provides a basis for understand
Ir. Méshac KIME ILUNGA
Ce document traite des procédés métallurgiques spéciaux, en mettant particulièrement l'accent sur l'extraction liquide-liquide, un processus mis au po
Copper solvent extraction units at large hydrometallurgical plants face constraints in metal recovery, phase disengagement, and reagent consumption, d
Non spécifié
L'hydrométallurgie du cuivre, principalement axée sur les minerais oxydés facilement solubles, s'applique également aux minerais sulfurés ou mixtes ap