PDF

Which minerals control the Nd–Hf–Sr–Pb isotopic compositions of river sediments?

Marion Garçona, Catherine Chauvel

2011enisotopesmineralsriver sedimentsgeochemistry

Abstract

Language:

River sediments naturally sample and average large areas of eroded continental crust, making them ideal for provenance studies based on isotopic compositions, while also establishing average isotopic values of continental crust. However, in large fluvial systems, mineral sorting processes can significantly alter the mineralogy and geochemistry of transported sediments, yet the extent to which this mineral sorting affects the isotopic compositions remains poorly quantified. This study focuses on the role of various mineral species in shaping the bulk isotopic compositions of bedloads and suspended loads from the Ganga River, which drains the Himalayas. We conducted isotopic analyses of Nd, Hf, Sr, and Pb, along with trace element contents from numerous pure mineral fractions, including K-feldspar, plagioclase, muscovite, and others. These findings were combined with mineral proportions typical of Ganga sediments to perform Monte Carlo simulations, enabling us to quantify the contributions of individual mineral species to the isotopic budgets of the river sediments. Our results reveal that few minerals dominate the isotopic systematics of river sediments, with zircon and monazite/allanite, despite their low abundances, playing crucial roles in controlling Hf and Nd isotopes respectively.

Download

Cite This Work

@article{af6c7706-7537-4a4b-9b42-5b422891c410,
  title={Which minerals control the Nd–Hf–Sr–Pb isotopic compositions of river sediments?},
  author={Marion Garçona and Catherine Chauvel},
  year={2011},
  language={en}
}
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Which minerals control the Nd–Hf–Sr–Pb isotopic compositions of river sediments?
AU  - Marion Garçona
AU  - Catherine Chauvel
PY  - 2011
LA  - en
ER  -

Similar Items

Solubility properties of synthetic and natural meta-torbernite

Fanny Cretaz, Stéphanie Szenknect

Meta-torbernite, Cu(UO2)2(PO4)2/C1 8H2O, is one of the most common secondary minerals resulting from the alteration of pitchblende. The determination

2013enPDF

Uranium(VI) attenuation in a carbonate-bearing oxic alluvial aquifer

PJ Nolan, Sharon E. Bone

Uranium minerals are commonly found in soils and sediment across the United States at an average concentration of 2 – 4 mg/kg. Uranium occurs in the e

2021enPDF

Rates and mechanisms of uranyl oxyhydroxide mineral dissolution

Estela Reinoso-Maset, Carl I. Steefel

Uranyl oxyhydroxide minerals are important weathering products in uranium-contaminated surface and subsurface environments that regulate dissolved ura

2017enPDF

Effect of bicarbonate and oxidizing conditions on U(IV) and U(VI) reactivity in mineralized deposits of New Mexico

Sumant Avasarala, Chris Torres

We investigated the effect of bicarbonate and oxidizing agents on uranium (U) reactivity and subsequent dissolution of U(IV) and U(VI) mineral phases

2019enPDF

Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies

David Pollard, Geoff Dunlop

The MetPlant 2008 conference focused on advancements in metallurgical processing of ores, emphasizing plant design, operation strategies, and innovati

2008enPDF

Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies

P Card, J Canterford

This document presents a collection of papers from the METPLANT 2011 conference focusing on metallurgical plant design and operating strategies. The o

2011enPDF