Gyan Prameswara, Flaviana Yohanala Prista Tyassena
Today, nickel plays a critical role in the industry. However, the presence of this metal in its primary source of sulfide minerals is decreasing. The focus of exploration has since turned to laterite ore, which contains up to 80% nickel metal. The purpose of this study is to optimize nickel leaching using sulfuric acid and to conduct kinetic analysis to discover the mechanism that best controls the leaching process. To optimize operating conditions, the response surface methodology (RSM) with box behnken design is used. The shrinking core model and the Zhuravlev, Leshchik, and Templeman (ZLT) model were used to assess the kinetics of the nickel leaching process. Mineral characterization was also performed to obtain a better understanding of the sample's characteristics. At 2 M sulfuric acid, 10% S/L ratio, and 90 °C, the highest nickel recovery of 85% was observed. The obtained apparent activation energy is 32.78 kJ/mol.
@article{d7accc92-bb30-47b0-9fb4-e7ed4d94e292,
title={Nickel Recovery Optimization and Kinetic},
author={Gyan Prameswara and Flaviana Yohanala Prista Tyassena},
year={2026},
language={en}
}TY - JOUR TI - Nickel Recovery Optimization and Kinetic AU - Gyan Prameswara AU - Flaviana Yohanala Prista Tyassena PY - 2026 LA - en ER -
Elena Bruce, Rossana Sepúlveda
Mathematical modeling of columnar leaching is a useful tool for predicting and evaluating the kinetics of copper extraction. One commonly used model f
Printed circuit boards (PCBs) from electronic gadgets at the end of their useful life period are currently being dumped in landfills or incinerated, c
The leachability tests for manufacturing scrap TV boards (STVB) have indicated the release of metals beyond the limit levels with potential problems f
Qiansa Wang, Yanjiao Wang
In the context of the transition from clean energy to sustainable development, as an emerging low-carbon energy carrier, hydrogen is of crucial import
Bram van Duinen, Karin van der Wiel
Energy system models are increasingly dependent on representative climate input. Yet, a fundamental mismatch persists between the hundreds of simulate